1 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Received: August 29, 2018 / Accepted: September 30, 2018 / Published: November 26, 2018
Keywords: argumentation, empiricalization, empirical methodology, historical-textual approach, meta-argumentation approach, experimental approach in cognitive psychology, cross-cultural approach
Eemeren, Frans Hendrik van (2015) Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Heidelberg etc.: Springer, 3-25.
Eemeren,Frans Hendrik van, Garssen, Bart, Krabbe, Erik C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A., Verheij, Bart, Wagemans, Jean H. M. eds. (2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht etc: Springer Reference.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (2005) Arguments about arguments. Systematic, critical and historical essays in logical theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (1994) Two empirical approaches to the study of reasoning. Informal Logic, 16, 1-21.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (2010) Defending Copernicus and Galileo. Critical reasoning in the two affairs. Dordrecht, Springer.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (1980) Galileo and the art of reasoning: rhetorical foundations of logic and scientific method. Boston, MA, Reidel.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (2013) Meta-argumentation. An approach to logic an argumentation theory. London, Colledge Publications.
Infante, Dominic A., & Wigley Charles J. (2009) Verbal aggressiveness: an interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61-69.
Hample, Dale (2018) Interpersonal arguing. New York, Peter Lang.
Hample, Dale (2003) Arguing skill. Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 439-478.
Hample, Dale (2005) Arguing: exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hample, Dale, and Anagondahalli, Deepa (2015) Understandings of arguing in India and the United States: Argument frames, personalization of conflict, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 44 (1), 1-26.
Hample, Dale, and Cionea, I. A. (2010) Taking conflict personally and its connections with aggressiveness. Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis, 372–387.
Hample, Dale, & Dallinger, Judith M. (1995) A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. Communication Quarterly, 43 (3), 297-319.
Hample, D., Han, Bing., & Payne, David (2010) The aggressiveness of playful arguments. Argumentation, 24 (4), 405-421.
Hample, Dale, and Irions, Amanda L. (2015) Arguing to display identity. Argumentation, 29 (4), 389-416.
Hample Dale, and Rapanta, Chrysi (2015) Orientations to interpersonal arguing in the United Arab Emirates, with comparisons to the United States, China, and India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 44 (4), 263-287.
Infante, Dominic. A., and Rancer, Andrew S. (1982) A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72-80.
Khomenko, Iryna (2018) Look at informal logic. Future Human Image, 9, 52-62.
Lewinski Marcin, Hample Dale, Sàágua João, & Mohammed Dima (2018) Arguing in Portugal: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 233-253.
Perelman, Chaim and Lucy Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958) Traité de l’argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France La Nouvelle Rhetorique.
Toulmin, Stephen E. (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen E. (2003) The uses of argument. Updated edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.