System Approach for Cosmology: a Version of a High-Potential Philosophical Research

Article
Open Access
by Vadim M. Rozin1
1 Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/12/5
Received: June 16, 2019 / Accepted: July 10, 2019 / Published: November 10, 2019

View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper

Abstract

The author invokes issues (integrity of the Universe, epistemological status of its nature, system approach specifics) prompting to discuss once again the nature of the system approach in cosmology. For this purpose, he reviews the genesis of the system approach. The author considers Plato’s representations concerning synthesis of many knowledge and introduction of the concept “system” in Condillac’s and Kant’s works. The opposition identified by them — a system is an organized scientific knowledge and a system as an object of this knowledge — may be found later in many system concepts. However George Shchedrovitsky additionally claims and shows that a system approach has to be specific to the developed subject domain. Therefore, in particular, when creating a system approach for a methodology, he interprets it as a section of methodology, and builds the latter upon this approach. Besides, Shchedrovitsky maintains that activity which was a subject matter in methodology acts as an intermediary between the methodology and the “system language”. The author assumes that there is good reason for creating intermediaries in all similar cases. Agreeing with the division of the history of cosmology into two stages: “prescientific” (mythological and philosophical) and scientific proper, the author suggests calling them “protocosmology” and cosmology proper, claiming that in the first case the whole — Space, Universe — were set by means of mythological or philosophical schemes. The author explains his understanding of the concept of “scheme” and particularities of mythological and philosophical schemes of the Universe. Unlike with protocosmology, in cosmological doctrines Universe models are created on the basis of natural science schemes. But outside natural sciences — in philosophy and human sciences — philosophical schemes still contest these models. Proceeding from Vadim Kazyutinsky’s works, the author asserts that in terms of key parameters Cosmology has to be referred to a humanitarian scientific discipline, and its object cannot be described within one scientific discipline; that “the cosmological reality” is a multi-level one, and each level is characterised by its own patterns which shall be described by different cosmological theories. Based on the above considerations, the author concludes that the system approach has to differ significantly from classical and synergetic approaches.

Keywords: system, approach, cosmology, protocosmology, methodology, discipline, Universe, scheme, model, doctrine, theory, reality, knowledge

References

Ackerman, Ari Hasdai (2017) Crescas and Scholastic Philosophers on the Possible Existence of Multiple Simultaneous Worlds. Aleph, Vol. 17, No. 1, 139-154. https://doi. org/10.2979/aleph.17.1.0139

Alasuutari, Pertti (1997) The discursive construction of personality. Lieblich, Amia and Ruthellen Josselson (Eds.). The narrative study of lives, Vol. 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1-20.

Bazaluk, Oleg, and Larysa Kharchenko (2018) The Philosophy of the Cosmos as the New Universal Philosophical Teaching about Being. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 21, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/1

Blauberg, Igor, Yudin, Eric, and Sadovsky, Vadim (2001) System approach. NFE. Vol. 3. Moscow, 559-560.

Book of Abstracts (2016) European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research Vienna 2016. Editors by Stefan Blachfellner and Tess Marja Werner. Available online: https://emcsr.net/wpcontent/uploads/2016/12/emcsr-avantgarde-2016-Book-of-Abstracts.pdf

Brandenberger, Robert, and Patrick Peter (2017) Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems. Foundations of Physics, Volume 47, Issue 6, 797–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0057-0

Condillac. Traité des systèmes (1980) Available online: http://knigi.link/kondilyak/traktat-sistemah-traite-6781.html

Ellisabc, Rayner (2014) Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. Volume 46, Part A, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.07.006.

Flood, Robert, and Norma Romm (2018) A Systemic Approach to Processes of Power in Learning Organizations: Part II — Triple Loop Learning and a Facilitative Intervention in the “500 Schools Project”. The Learning Organization, 25(4), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2017-0106

Gil, Francisco and Manuel Alfonseca (2014) About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science. Vol. 29, No. 3 (81), 361-373. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43612983

Ginzburg, Vitaly (1981) What is the role of philosophy, astronomy and physics in the solution of the most urgent problem of cosmology — the choice of the Universe model consistent with the reality. Earth and Universe, No. 1. Available online: https://www.bestreferat.ru/referat-219926.html

Kant, Immanuel (1964) Critique of Practical Reason. Collected works in 6 v. Vol. 3. Moscow.

Karpouzos, Alexsis (2015) Cosmology Philosophy and Physics. Published by Think.Lab, Athens, Greece, 1-58.

Kazyutinsky, Vadim (1993) Traditions and revolution in modern astronomy. Doctoral thesis. Moscow.

Kragh, Helge (2014) Naming the Big Bang. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 1, 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2014.44.1.3

Maracha, Vyacheslav (2018) System thinking and procedures of collective solution of problems. System analysis in economy — 2018: Collected works of the V Biennial International Scientific and Practical Conference (November 21-23, 2018) / edited by G. B. Kleyner, S.E. Shchepetova. Moscow, Prometheus, 365-368.

Marra, Valerio (2017) Understanding Our Only Universe. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 19.

Mobus, George (2015) A Systems Science Framework for Understanding the Nature of Governance. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the ISSS — 2015 Berlin, Germany. Vol. 1, No 1. Available online: http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings59th/article/download/2497/883

Mobus, George (2017) A Framework for Understanding and Achieving Sustainability of Complex Systems: Framework for Sustainability of Complex Systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 34, Issue 5, 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2482

Mobus, George, and Michael Kalton (2014) Principles of Systems Science. Springer.

Morecroft, J. (2015) Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics. A Feedback Systems Approach. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester.

Nesteruk, Alexei (2011) Cosmology at the Crossroads of Natural and Human Sciences: is Demarcation Possible? Part 2. Explication. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 5, 644-666.

Panov, Alexander (2017) The Structure of Reality, or Where to Find the Final Theory? Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 19, 74-94

Plato (2993) Fedr. Collected works in 4 v. V.2. Moscow.

Rozin, Vadim (2007) Regarding the problem of demarcation of natural and human sciences, as well as where shall we refer cosmology to. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, No. 1.

Rozin, Vadim (2011) Introduction to schemology: Schemes in philosophy, culture, science, design. Moscow, LIBROKOM.

Rozin, Vadim (2017) Nature: The notion and the stages of development in the European culture. Moscow, LENAND.

Rozin, Vadim (2018) The ideas of Bogdanov’s “Tectology” in works of the architect Rosenberg (the first stages of formation of the methodology of design). Urbanistics, No. 3, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.7256/2310-8673.2018.3.27899

Rozin, Vadim (2019) Georgy Shchedrovitsky’s Concept of Activite and Thought-Activity. Philosophical thought in Russia in the second half of the twentieth century. BloomsburyAcademic, 245-259.

Rousseau, D., Wilby, J., Billingham, J., and Blachfellner, S. (2016) Manifesto for General Systems Transdisciplinarity. Systema, 4(1). Special Issue — General Systems Transdisciplinarity, 4-14. Available online: http://www.systema-journal.org/article/view/401

Shchedrovitsky, Georgy (1995) Initial representations and categorial means of the theory of activity. Selected works. Moscow.

Shchedrovitsky, Georgy (1995a) System movement and outlooks of development of the system-andstructural methodology. Selected works. Moscow.

Shchedrovitsky, Georgy (1995b) Principles and general scheme of methodological organization of system-and-structural researches and development. Selected works. Moscow.

Stasishina, Yulia (2017) Our world is not the only: the theory of parallel Universes. Available online: https://sciencepop .ru/nash-mir-ne-edinstvennyj-teoriya-parallelnyh-vselennyh/

Tavakol, Reza, and Fabio Gironi (2017) The Infinite Turn and Speculative Explanations in Cosmology. Foundations of Science, Volume 22, Issue 4, 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9499-2

Vincenzi, Simone, Crivelli, Alain J., Stephan Munch, Stephan, Skaug, Hans J. and Mangel, Marc (2016) Trade-Offs between Accuracy and Interpretability in Von Bertalanffy RandomEffects Models of Growth. Ecological Applications, Vol. 26, no. 5, 1535–1552.

Wilby, J., Blachfellner, S., Hofkirchner, W. (eds.), (2014). Civilisation at the Crossroads. Response and Responsibility of the Systems Sciences, European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Book of Abstracts. Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna.

Zinkernagel, Henrik (2014) Philosophical aspects of modern cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46 (Special Issue on Philosophy of Cosmology), 1-4.

Share and Cite

Rozin, Vadim M. (2019) System Approach for Cosmology: a Version of a High-Potential Philosophical Research. Future Human Image, Volume 12, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/12/5
Back to the list of Articles